The Ryanair Guide to Assertive Writing

by Ivan Walsh on August 9, 2011

A quick Google for ‘Ryanair sucks’ returns thousands of hits. It’s one of the most despised airlines in the world. And rightly so. It makes huge profits, destroys old monopolies, and ‘names and shames’ those that cross its path.

As a business writer, you can learn a lot from Ryanair. I’ve studied their press releases, marketing messages, and the language its CEO uses when shredding competitors.

ryanair press release writing

Why Assertive Writing Is More Memorable?

Most airlines don’t attack one another directly. They talk about the competition in vague terms. It’s not very interesting… or memorable.

Ryanair is the opposite.

It identifies its competitors, highlights their weaknesses, and then goes after them.

And it does it again and again and again…

Most firms can’t respond. They don’t know how to. And by the time they respond, they look slow, dim, and defensive.

Here’s an example.

‘Ryanair’s record traffic growth continues as more and more passengers switch from high fare, fuel surcharging flag carriers, such as Aer Lingus, Air France, BA and Lufthansa – who can’t compete with Ryanair’s low fares or No1 customer service (including best punctuality, baggage delivery and flight completions).’

Read that again.

‘Aer Lingus, Air France, BA and Lufthansa can’t compete with Ryanair’s low fares or No1 customer service’

Can you imagine BA saying this about Lufthansa? Probably not as they may have some alliance.

These firms have two options: ignore or respond.

Most don’t take up the challenge.

So, Ryanair takes more swipes at them.

‘Ryanair confirmed that while it continues to grow at lower cost airports outside Ireland , it has recently had its offer for 5m additional passengers at Irish airports (over five years) turned down by the Dept of Transport who continue to allow the DAA monopoly to mismanage and oversee traffic collapses at Ireland’s main airports (while Ryanair grows rapidly)’

This approach puts others on the defensive. And regardless of how well they respond, they’re on the back foot. Not where you want to be.

‘While Ryanair grows sadly Irish air traffic and tourism continues to decline because of the Govt’s travel tax and the DAA’s high airport fees.’

Remember, this is a press release. When’s the last time you read a press release that carried so much punch?

‘Ryanair’s unbeatable formula of lowest fares, no fuel surcharges and No1 customer service continues to encourage passengers to switch from high fare, fuel surcharging, strike-ridden flag carriers including Aer Lingus, Air France, British Airways and Lufthansa.”

How does Aer Lingus, Air France, British Airways and Lufthansa respond to this?

Very badly.

How to be an Assertive Writer

So, should you start writing like Ryanair? Savaging your competitors, lambasting their shoddy services, and deriding their inferior products? It’s worth considering.

But there is a downside.

Ryanair can say this – and get away with it – as it does offer lower rates, more destinations, and has shaken up the industry. So, it’s not empty rhetoric.

Even more important. The ‘us v them’ mentality runs through the entire company. The CEO (Michael O’Leary) leads from the front, setting the tone. Others follow his example.

Unless your CEO offers the same support, adopting Ryanair’s tactics is likely to backfire. Rather than getting credit, you may find yourself isolated and accused of mis-understanding the company’s core values.

Before we go.

If you wanted to propose this assertive type of writing to your boss, how would you go about it? What objections would she have? How would you address them?


Need help with your documents? Click Here for a Free Quote


Click here to get a free quote

Related posts:

  1. S.P.E.E.D. Writing – 37 Ways to Increase Your Business Writing Productivity
  2. Machiavelli’s Guide to Writing Persuasive White Papers
  • Rclinton90302

    I worked for a company which was doing an audit of their vendor in anticipation of embarking on a project that involved replacing and upgrading equipment. I wrote a report for my company to present to our customer regarding the findings we had with their vendor. The report spoke to the areas where the vendor was either exceptionally compliant or compliant, where they barely met expectations and could use improvement and where they were sadly deficient and required immediate remedy or, at minimum, required an immediate response to indicate how they were going to fix their shortcoming.

    My report incorporated very strong language, using phrases like “Problems that must be addressed immediately”, “We recommend demand immediate remediation of…issues…according to the recommendations made ”, “We recommend demand a timetable…”, and “There is sufficient cause for concern…to warrant an intense program to either fix or mitigate issues…”.

    The report was rewritten, eliminating those phrases and setting the tone of “…partnership with vendor will not present a significant risk…” and “…vendor will need to expend a minimal level of effort to mitigate…”.

    It appeared that my company was trying to encourage our customer that they had made a good choice of vendor while my effort was in the direction that our customer should use its muscle to ensure that the vendor complied with requirements. In the end, I blame myself for using such strong language as I came from a company culture where my company was regularly exposed to the kind of language that I employed where the tenor of the project for which I was then working was more along the lines of giving our customer some assurance that they were on the right track.

    My point simply being that the writing style one uses, including how aggressive one’s writing should be, is dictated by the ends that your employer is trying to meet.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Yes, I’ve had something like this when I evaluated RFPs for the gov.

    They suggested I toned down some of the criticism of the vendors.

    Why?

    You can access the reports under the freedom of information act and didnt want to possible offend anyone in the process.

    Needless, to say some of the reports were deliberately opaque :)

  • http://www.writeabio.com Barbra, Bio Writer

    This is where the art of “damning with faint praise” can be used to great effect.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    That’s right. These guys are masters of mixing it up to give themselves an edge and… keeping others on the back foot, which of course makes the competitors look defensive :)

Previous post:

Next post: